Side-by-Side Comparison
Close vs Apollo.io
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Close, Apollo.io to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
Reviews Summary
Close
(51)
Side-by-Side Comparison
Detailed side-by-side comparison of Close, Apollo.io to help you pick the best tool.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | ||
| Rating |
You can compare up to 4 tools. Add more tools →
4.5/5.0 |
| Reviews | 51 reviews | 67 reviews |
| TT Score | TT 70/100 | TT 76/100 |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $49/user/mo | Free |
| Free Trial |
| Platforms | WebiOSAndroidMacWindows | WebChrome Extension |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| Team Size | 11-50 | 501-1000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| Verified |
| Has Deal |
| Upvotes | 207 | 264 |
| Recommend % | N/A | N/A |
| Action |
Excellent value for money
Great pricing, generous free tier, fast performance, regular improvements
Enterprise features are limited. Reports could use more customization options.
Excellent value for money
Great pricing, generous free tier, fast performance, regular improvements
Enterprise features are limited. Reports could use more customization options.
Solid platform that delivers
Intuitive interface, excellent integrations, reliable performance, good documentation
Some features are gated behind higher pricing tiers. Mobile app could be better.
Excellent value for money
Great pricing, generous free tier, fast performance, regular improvements
Enterprise features are limited. Reports could use more customization options.
Solid platform that delivers
Intuitive interface, excellent integrations, reliable performance, good documentation
Powerful but has some quirks
Powerful feature set, customizable, integrates with everything we use
Some features are gated behind higher pricing tiers. Mobile app could be better.
Steep learning curve, inconsistent support, UI could be modernized